Global Warming/Climate Change Guide for Dummies

QUESTION:

craig

ANSWER: According to our models, this downturn should be greater than the last one in the 1700s. Volatility rises, so the swings in climate become much more dramatic with the turn of these cycles. It is similar to a stock market crash; once it breaks, the volatility rises, and market prices appears very choppy. So there will be a burst to the upside, followed by new lows on the downside. I am in Paris, where it is nowhere near as warm as the States. People are wearing jackets on the streets. Northern Europe never really warmed up this year. When I was here in the spring, I had to buy sweaters since it was much colder than I expected.

These cycles in climate were originally discovered through analyzing ice core samples from the North Pole that revealed a 300-year cycle in climate defined as the energy output of the sun. When I saw the presentation presented by Harvard scientists back in the 1980s, I immediate saw their chart was close to the 309.6-year cycle in the ECM. We have documentation on the sun now, which is a thermodynamic system that beats like your heart. The cycle defines the maximum and minimum over a 300-year period and explains migrations and the rise and fall of civilization.

The last downturn was pretty bad. It seems to line up with the revolution cycle, as it probably aggravated society and caused a move toward civil unrest. Some 2500 men died at Valley Forge from exposure during the winter encampment. Clearly, this cycle has driven war by conquest, and is linked by a change in climate that has marked a reduction in food supply.

This downturn in global cooling will spark a rise in food prices on the horizon. The global warming/climate change crowd always tries to reduce blame to a single factor. This type of thinking has seriously retarded our evolutionary process. They are incapable of dynamic thinking and are incompetent insofar as just observing the world around them. They destroy our future in every possible way for their ignorance condemns us to repeat history in every field that employs this form of primitive — always reducing whatever the issue is to single cause and effect.

I am reviewing new research by another scientist who has linked changes in the magnetic field to earthquakes; they seem to pinpoint the area. We are running it through our system to see the correlations historically to verify the work. It looks very promising. The solar polar fields (SPF) data which flips with the sunspot activity on an 11-year cycle, as measured by the Wilcox Solar Observatory (WSO), has been studied and compared with the large magnitude earthquake record from the United States Geological Survey. The time period covers the 38 years (+13,600 days) that the WSO has collected the SPF data. This study reveals a dependence of M8.0+ seismic activity on the oscillations of the SPF. We are also starting to see an increase in earthquake activity with this cycle. Yellowstone has the worst quake in year 34 last June.

This 309.6-year ECM cycle was discovered by economics, but the sun cycle fits in. There are also waves of volcanic activity that correlate as well. The explosion of Thera (Santorini) during around the time of Moses and his confrontation with the Pharaoh also marked the collapse of the Minoan civilization. This is when the barbarian Greeks conquered Crete after the eruption and their economy was devastated, and then they took Troy. So the established empire fell, the barbarians were at the gates, and then Greece collapsed into a Dark Age. The Greeks became the dreaded “Sea People” who invaded Northern Africa. It now appears that the Philistines were of Greek Mycenaean origin.

So these downturns and volatility in climate that the global warming fraudsters (who then changed the term to “climate change” when it was not getting warmer), attribute everything to man. Even today, the current level of volcano activity shows that globally, volcanoes on land and under the sea release 200 million tonnes of CO₂ annually. It’s a fact that Kilauea in Hawaii, which erupts continuously, has been releasing more than twice the amount of noxious sulfur dioxide gas (SO₂) as the single dirtiest power plant on the U.S. mainland on a daily basis. So even if we shut down power plants and ride bicycles, you will by no means eliminate the claimed greenhouse gases.

When Mount St. Helens erupted, President Ronald Reagan made this comment:

I have flown twice over Mount St. Helens out on our West Coast. I’m not a scientist and I don’t know the figures, but I have a suspicion that that one little mountain has probably released more sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere of the world than has been released in the last ten years of automobile driving or things of that kind that people are so concerned about.

—President Ronald Reagan, 1980

Mount Saint Helens Eruption 1980

Reagan was right because automobiles principally emit carbon compounds, such as carbon monoxide, and nitrous oxides. Sulfur dioxide is not a problem with auto emissions. According a source untainted by the global warming/climate change crowd, the U.S. Geological Society said:

An estimated 1.5 million metric tons of sulfur dioxide gas was discharged by Mount St. Helens during the explosive eruption of 18 May 1980. Thus, approximately 2 million metric tons of sulfur dioxide was released during the whole eruption sequence.

Consequently, there are two problems with the data. Even the EPA admits it cannot accurately attribute how much greenhouse gas is naturally created vs. manmade. Consider the massive release of sulfur dioxide that occurred following the eruption of Mount St. Helens combined with the likely gas eruption before and after five years on either side of the eruption. If we consider these factors, then Reagan’s “suspicion that that one little mountain has probably released more sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere of the world than has been released in the last ten years of automobile driving” appears to be fairly accurate.

It appears that we would enter a White Earth Effect and die as a planet if the volcanic activity ceased. That is the source of warming up the planet again when the sun turns down. Sure, man may add to volatility, but we by no means possess the power to change the climate cycle. There is ABSOLUTELY ZERO proof that the long-term 300-year cycle has changed. People who believe this nonsense should not read this blog for they must also be a deep-rooted Marxist who believes all the BS of governments. If you buy into that, you might as well buy into everything they say.  Only an idiot can possibly think we have the capacity to alter the universe or how it functions. We are incapable of even grasping all the variables at play.

If you have a basement, you can grow your own food without land, which may be the next hot trend.