Insurers sue Saudi Arabia for 9/11

Several major insurers have launched a new attempt to sue Saudi Arabia for 6 billion dollars for the September 11, 2001 attacks. One wonders had Hillary been elected and Saudi Arabia was a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation to support women and gay rights (outside of their own country), would this have taken place? Others wonder that is Saudi Arabia can be sued for being behind 911 in some way, then does that mean Hillary is guilty of treason taking money from a foreign enemy? Interesting questions the press will never ask.

Liberty Mutual, Safeco, Wausau, and other corporations accuse the Wahhabi kingdom and its close-reaching foundation of having allowed the Al-Qaeda attacks on the World Trade Centers and other targets in 2001 with funds and other support. The government’s ruling in Riyadh and the Foundation did not take place on Friday. Saudi Arabia has repeatedly rejected an involvement in the attacks. At that time, nearly 3000 people died.

The application was filed late Thursday at a federal district court in Manhattan. An early start of the insurers had been rejected in September 2015. Saudi Arabia enjoyed immunity in the US for a long time as far as the attacks were concerned. However, the US Congress in 2016, despite a veto by then President Barack Obama, issued a law that allows lawsuits.